Chelsey Geer

A Documented Account of Domestic Violence and Housing Fraud

Based on police reports, video evidence, and official documentation (2025-2026)

⚠️ Content Warning This narrative documents incidents of domestic violence, property damage, harassment, and trauma. Contains descriptions of substance abuse, stalking, and psychological abuse. If you're experiencing domestic violence or need support: National Domestic Violence Hotline: 1-800-799-7233 | Online Chat: thehotline.org

🏠 Chapter 1: A New Beginning

December 2024 - February 2025

Jesse Lucus, a disabled veteran, was eligible for permanent supportive housing through his VA benefits. In December 2024, the VA referred him to Insight Housing, a nonprofit organization tasked with helping veterans find stable housing. This should have been a turning point—a chance at stability after years of hardship.

In February 2025, Jesse signed a lease for an apartment at 1055 72nd Avenue in Oakland, California without ever seeing it in person. This was a blind rental arrangement. The lease was structured through the SSVF (Supportive Services for Veteran Families) rapid rehousing program, with the VA and Insight Housing covering approximately 75% of annual rent upfront, plus security deposit.

But there was a problem.

The building at 1055 72nd Avenue had a dark history. What Jesse didn't know on move-in day was that this property had been red-tagged by the City of Oakland in 2019 as structurally unsound and illegally occupied. The building had a documented 20-year history of complaints: broken windows, holes in walls, water damage, trash accumulation, and persistent habitability violations.

Even worse, the property owner, Elizabeth Ann Williams, had a criminal record. In 2020, she was prosecuted for felony bribery—paying building inspectors over $300,000 to issue fraudulent safety clearances on similar properties.

📋 Evidence:
• Move-in date: February 19, 2025 (1055 72nd Ave, Unit #4)
• Lease structure: SSVF rapid-rehousing with $0 rent for 4 months, then 25% bimonthly increases to $1,750
• VA funds: ~$30,000+ in federal HUD-VASH grant disbursed upfront (12/24/2024)
• Building history: Illegal red-tag 2019, multiple Code Enforcement complaints 1997-2025
• Property owner criminal background: PEC bribery case (2020), $300k+ in bribes documented
📹 Video Evidence: "2-2025 Dog Entry.MOV" (176MB) - First week habitability documentation

💔 Chapter 2: March 2025 - A Chance Meeting

The Beginning of the Pattern

In March 2025, while riding the bus, Jesse met a woman named Chelsey. She was friendly, and after a casual conversation, they exchanged contact information. Soon they began dating. What started as a connection would become the source of months of documented harassment, property damage, and police intervention.

When Chelsey learned where Jesse lived, his anxieties about privacy began. He had good reason to be concerned.

Jesse had survived a previous abusive relationship. In 2023, he had been involved with someone named Kiante Burton-Solomon. The relationship was characterized by financial exploitation, theft, and violence. After Jesse fought for and regained custody of his emotional support dog in court (May-June 2023), Kiante filed a false rape allegation against him (June 4, 2023). Though the allegation was baseless, it created a permanent record of accusation.

Now, with Chelsey's frequent unannounced visits and escalating behavior, Jesse's PTSD from the prior abuse was triggered. He set a reasonable boundary: Chelsey needed to call before coming over and respect his space.

Chelsey agreed verbally. She did not honor this boundary.

📋 Evidence:
• Meeting date: March 2025 (bus encounter)
• Relationship timeline: Dating begins, relationship becomes intimate ~1 month later (early April)
• Prior abuse pattern (2023): Kiante Burton-Solomon - theft, fraud, false rape allegation
• Court victory: Regained ESA dog custody (5/23/2023, confirmed 6/1/2023)
• Boundary set: Chelsey to call before visits; boundary immediately violated

🚨 Chapter 3: April 2025 - Boundaries Broken

First Police Calls

In April, after Chelsey came to the apartment for the first time, Jesse discovered something critical: Chelsey was an alcoholic who drank to blackout every single day.

With alarming consistency, Chelsey began showing up at Jesse's apartment unannounced, drunk, sometimes multiple times per day. When drunk, her behavior would escalate—verbal abuse, insults, name-calling, and destruction of property. She would scream at Jesse, accuse him of various things, and damage his belongings.

Jesse began calling Oakland Police. He had no other option. His landlord (Insight Housing through Elizabeth Williams) was unresponsive to requests for security improvements. The building's broken gate, lack of cameras, and absence of any real security made Jesse's apartment a soft target for Chelsey's intrusions.

From April through December 2025, Jesse would call 911 approximately 16+ times documenting Chelsey's unwanted visits, trespassing, threats, and property damage.

April 11, 2025 April 25, 2025 April 29, 2025
📋 Evidence:
• Chelsey's alcohol use: Daily blackout drinking documented in multiple video files
• First OPD calls: 4/11, 4/25, 4/29/2025
• Call method: Jesse used text-to-911 to create written record of incidents
• Recording practice: Jesse began recording Chelsey's drunk episodes for documentation
📹 Video Evidence: "2025 Proof of Correspondence Logs.mp4" (188MB) - Primary master timeline starting at 0:32 with all 16 calls documented
📹 Video Evidence: "4-2025 Chelsey incidents" (referenced in April period)

💰 Chapter 4: February 18, 2025 - The Fraudulent Disclosure

HUD-VASH Fraud in the Foundation

While the April police calls were happening, Jesse was unaware of a deeper problem happening behind the scenes at Insight Housing.

On February 5, 2025, Jesse had completed an accurate financial disclosure with Nhu-Ly Tran, his Fremont HUD-VASH supervisor. The disclosure reported his actual income: money from Fused Gaming LLC, a tech consulting business he ran. This was truthful and complete.

But on February 18, 2025—just days after move-in—something shocking happened.

Roynelle Mayfield, the case manager from Insight Housing, called Jesse in for a meeting. When they sat down together, Mayfield physically tore up the accurate disclosure and demanded that Jesse sign a materially false one instead. The false disclosure omitted his business income entirely, making him appear much poorer than he actually was—qualifying him for federal subsidies he shouldn't have received.

Jesse signed under protest and duress. He had no choice. Mayfield had control over his housing.

This was fraud in the inducement—a federal crime. The false disclosure would be used to justify housing payments and subsidies that Jesse was not eligible to receive.

When Fremont had declined to issue Jesse a business license (citing "no address"), the entire structure had been built on the lie that Fused Gaming didn't exist—a deception Mayfield created and enforced.

📋 Evidence:
• Accurate disclosure date: February 5, 2025 (Fremont HUD-VASH with Nhu-Ly Tran)
• Fraudulent disclosure date: February 18, 2025 (Roynelle Mayfield)
• Method: Case manager physically destroyed accurate document, coerced false signature
• Crime type: Fraud in the inducement, federal grant fraud
• Parties involved: Roynelle Mayfield (case manager), Insight Housing, Nhu-Ly Tran (supervisor), Sarah Solis (program director)
📋 Document Evidence: "Exh. T (accurate disclosure)" vs. "Exh. U (fraudulent disclosure)"
📋 Document Evidence: "Exh. V (destroyed docs evidence)"

📈 Chapter 5: June 2025 - The Nonprofit Stops Responding

When Help Becomes Abandonment

Throughout April and May, Jesse had been requesting security improvements from Insight Housing and Elizabeth Williams. The gate was broken and could be lifted or forced open. There were no cameras. No alarm system. Thieves kept entering the complex.

On June 5, 2025, Jesse reached a breaking point. He asked Insight Housing directly for their attorney's contact information. He was considering legal action against them for negligence and breach of the housing agreement.

That same day, Insight Housing stopped answering his calls and emails.

What should have been a nonprofit housing provider supporting a disabled veteran had become an adversary. The organization had collected federal funds for his housing ($30,000+) but was refusing to provide basic security—and now, when called to account, they ghosted him entirely.

Jesse was alone, living in an illegally red-tagged building, being harassed daily by an alcoholic ex-girlfriend, with no support from the organization paid to help him.

June 11, 2025 - Police call documented
📋 Evidence:
• Request for attorney: June 5, 2025
• Response from Insight Housing: Silence. Calls/emails ignored from June onward.
• Pattern: Grantee abandonment coincides with active safety crisis
• Federal implications: Potential SSVF program fraud and negligence claim

🆘 Chapter 6: September 8-17, 2025 - THE CRISIS PERIOD

Four Calls in Ten Days

CRITICAL INCIDENT PERIOD

Between September 8 and September 17, 2025—a span of just 10 days—Jesse called Oakland Police 4 times. This represented the highest density of incidents in the entire timeline.

During this period, Chelsey's behavior had escalated beyond verbal abuse and property damage. The recordings Jesse made documented her showing up in blackout states, screaming, throwing objects, making false accusations, and threatening harm.

On September 16, Jesse recorded video evidence of Chelsey falsely accusing him of kicking her. The video clearly showed the lie and captured her aggressive behavior toward him.

September 8, 2025 September 14, 2025 September 16, 2025 September 17, 2025

What made this period significant:

  • Highest incident concentration in 2025 (33% of annual calls in 10 days)
  • Video documentation of false assault allegations
  • Evidence of escalating psychological abuse and harassment
  • Crystal clear pattern of unannounced trespassing and property destruction
  • OPD dispatch records confirming 24+ calls to the address in 2025
📋 Evidence:
• OPD calls: 9/8, 9/14, 9/16, 9/17/2025
• Call response pattern: Dispatch to 1055 72nd Ave confirmed in police records
• Recording: Video of false kicking accusation (9/16/2025)
• Document: OPD incident reports for each call
📹 Video Evidence: "9-2025 Chelsey.MOV" (3.5GB - primary crisis period documentation)
📹 Video Evidence: "9-2025 Chelsey Kicked.MOV" (518MB - false assault claim)
📹 Video Evidence: "9-9-2025 lock.MOV" (56MB - security incident)

💻 Chapter 7: November 3, 2025 - Window Burglary

The Price of an Inadequate Building

On November 3, 2025, while Jesse was out walking his emotional support dog, someone reached through his window and stole critical items:

  • MacBook Pro containing years of professional work, business files, and conference materials ($1,500+)
  • Apartment keys ($11 key + chains)
  • Laundry coins and container ($45 in quarters)

Total loss: $278+ in immediate damages, plus incalculable professional loss.

The MacBook theft was particularly devastating. It contained conference materials for an SF developer event Jesse had been invited to speak at. The theft prevented his participation and damaged his professional credibility.

That same day, Jesse hired Fused Gaming LLC to conduct a professional security audit of the property. The audit confirmed what Jesse already knew: the gate hinge was compromised, easily bypassed, and left unsecured by residents. There was no self-closing mechanism, no camera, no alarm, no motion lighting. The latch was reachable from the exterior and could be easily manipulated.

The audit concluded that California law (Civil Code §§1714, 1941.3) required the landlord to maintain reasonably secure premises, and given repeated thefts and documented complaints, future crimes were foreseeable. Failure to correct the known hazards could result in landlord negligence liability.

Jesse sent a written demand to Elizabeth Williams that same day. The response was silence.

📋 Evidence:
• Theft date: November 3, 2025
• Items stolen: MacBook Pro, keys, laundry coins ($278+ total loss)
• Professional impact: SF developer conference participation prevented
• Security audit: FG-2025-1101-1055-72nd (Fused Gaming LLC)
• Audit findings: Gate hinge compromised, no self-locking mechanism, no security devices
• Legal basis: Civil Code §1714 (duty to maintain safe premises), §1941.3 (habitability)
📋 Document: "11-3-2025 FG-Security-Audit.pdf"
📋 Document: "11-3-2025 Stolen Keys Demand.PNG" - Contemporaneous written demand
📹 Video Evidence: "10-2025 Gate Stolen Laptop.MOV" (83MB - burglary documentation)

📞 Chapter 8: August - December 2025 - The Pattern Continues

Ongoing Police Calls Documentation

Beyond the September crisis peak, Jesse documented a sustained pattern of incidents throughout 2025:

August 2025: As summer ended, incidents escalated. Chelsey's visits became more aggressive. Jesse called police on August 26 and again on August 29.

October 2025: One documented call (October 9). The harassment continued but with slightly less frequency than September's crisis period. On October 3 and October 20, Jesse captured on video Chelsey's harassment and a suspicious visitor (Kiante Burton-Solomon—his abusive ex—attempting to make contact).

November 2025: Four documented police calls (November 6, 24, 27, and 30). After the window burglary on November 3, Jesse was hypervigilant. The calls continued as Chelsey would not stop attempting contact.

December 2025: The final documented 2025 call came on December 12. The pattern had continued unabated for 8 months.

August 26, 2025 August 29, 2025 October 9, 2025 November 6, 2025 November 24, 2025 November 27, 2025 November 30, 2025 December 12, 2025
📋 Evidence:
• August calls: 8/26, 8/29/2025 (escalation resumption)
• October incident: 10/20/2025 - Visitor (Kiante) attempting contact (documented in photo)
• November calls: 11/6, 11/24, 11/27, 11/30/2025 (post-theft pattern)
• December call: 12/12/2025 (final 2025 documented incident)
📹 Video Evidence: "8-2025 Stalking and Vandalism.MOV" (94MB)
📹 Video Evidence: "8-2025 Rep Simon SSVF Complaint.mp4" (29MB - Congressional complaint)
📹 Video Evidence: "10-2025 Gate Lock.MOV" (56MB) and "10-2025 Escaping.MOV" (1.6GB)
📹 Video Evidence: "11-2025 Roaches.MOV" (11MB - habitability violations)
📹 Video Evidence: "11-4-2025 OPD.mp4" (238MB - police response documentation)
📹 Video Evidence: "6-2025 Chelsey.MOV" and "6-2025 Chelsey 2.MOV" (continued June harassment)

⚖️ Chapter 9: January 4-8, 2026 - The Retaliation

Federal Complaint → Eviction in 4 Days

By January 2026, Jesse had reached a breaking point. He had documented 16 police calls, had conducted a professional security audit showing the building was unsafe, and had been abandoned by both his housing provider (Insight Housing) and law enforcement who took his calls but never resolved the underlying problem.

On January 4, 2026, Jesse called the National Homeless Veterans Hotline (a federal program) and filed a formal, recorded complaint. His complaint documented:

  • SSVF (HUD-VASH) program abandonment by Insight Housing
  • Unsafe conditions at 1055 72nd Avenue
  • Non-response from his case manager and supervisors
  • The need for immediate relocation

This was a protected federal complaint. Under California Labor Code § 1942.5 and 38 CFR Part 62, whistleblower retaliation is illegal. You cannot evict someone for reporting housing fraud or safety violations.

On January 8, 2026—exactly four days later—Jesse received a Summons and Complaint for Unlawful Detainer (UD 26CV163434).

The eviction was filed 4 days after the protected federal complaint. This is textbook retaliation.

Elizabeth Williams claimed Jesse owed rent (despite SSVF covering it) and filed for his immediate removal. The timing was too convenient to be coincidental. Jesse had just blown the whistle on a federal housing program and was immediately sued for eviction.

Jesse had insufficient funds to pay the court filing fees. The legal system had suddenly become adversarial.

"I made a federal complaint about unsafe housing on January 4th. The eviction was filed four days later. This is clearly retaliation under California law. I have the recordings, the police calls, the security audit. I did everything right. And I'm being punished for it."
📋 Evidence:
• Federal complaint: January 4, 2026 (National Homeless Veterans Hotline - recorded)
• Complaint content: SSVF abandonment, unsafe conditions, non-response by Insight Housing
• Eviction filing: January 8, 2026 (UD 26CV163434)
• Days between complaint and filing: 4 days (clear retaliation pattern)
• Legal basis for retaliation claim: CC § 1942.5, 38 CFR Part 62 (federal whistleblower protection)
• Default judgment: Entered January 26, 2026 ($7,900)
• Writ of Possession: Issued 1/27/2026, execution scheduled 1/31/2026
📋 Document: Exh. C - Hotline audio recording (protected complaint)
📋 Document: Exh. E - Third recorded hotline call (1/22/2026)
📹 Audio Evidence: "VA_Homeless_Hotline.m4a" - 8:27 recorded call

🕵️ Chapter 10: January 2026 - Uncovering the Larger Pattern

From Personal Harassment to Systemic Fraud

While facing eviction, Jesse began researching. He filed CPRA (California Public Records Act) and FOIA requests. He pulled court documents. He examined the property records. What he discovered was shocking.

The problem wasn't just Chelsey. The problem wasn't just Insight Housing's abandonment. The problem was a systematic housing fraud scheme involving multiple parties:

  • Insight Housing: Falsified financial disclosures to secure undeserved federal subsidies
  • Elizabeth Ann Williams: Known bribery felon housing veterans in an illegally red-tagged building
  • Case management: Coerced signing of fraudulent documents under duress
  • Program abandonment: Ghosting veterans when they requested support
  • Building safety: Foreseeable crimes due to inadequate security, with known hazards unrepaired

This wasn't an isolated incident. This was a program infrastructure failure affecting potentially dozens of vulnerable veterans.

On January 19, 2026, Jesse sent an email to Representative Lateefah Simon's office detailing the HUD-VASH fraud. He also contacted:

  • The VA (Veterans Affairs) call center
  • VA Office of Inspector General (OIG)
  • Oakland Police Department
  • HUD Police
  • City of Oakland officials

He received no response from any of them.

📋 Evidence:
• Email to Rep. Lateefah Simon: January 19, 2026
• Contacts made same day: VA, VA OIG, Oakland PD, HUD Police, city officials
• Response received: None (31 days before town hall incident)
• Fraud scheme elements: Falsified disclosures, undeserved subsidies, bribery felon as landlord, program abandonment
📋 Document: Exh. W - Email to Rep. Simon dated 1/19/2026
📋 Document: FOIA/CPRA Records Requests (multiple agencies)

🚫 Chapter 11: February 19, 2026 - Town Hall Exclusion

Silencing the Whistleblower

Exactly 31 days after Jesse emailed Representative Lateefah Simon about the HUD-VASH fraud, he attended a public town hall at Oakland City Hall (One Frank H. Ogawa Plaza).

Representative Simon was hosting a community forum. Jesse attended to ask questions about the housing fraud he had documented. But he never got the chance.

As Jesse entered, security personnel singled him out. They told him he was not welcome. They said he had made "threats" and should leave.

There were no threats. Jesse had sent a professional, detailed email documenting fraud. Requesting Congressional attention to a federal program crime is not a threat. It's the purpose of Congress.

Jesse was escorted out of the public town hall. The incident was witnessed by Chelsea Geer (a witness present at the event), and Jesse recorded audio of the entire exchange.

The message was clear: raise questions about housing fraud, and you will be excluded from public forums. Report the program, and you will be silenced.

On February 19, 2026, Jesse served Representative Lateefah Simon with a demand letter documenting defamation, libel, slander, and unlawful exclusion from a public forum.

"I reported fraud. I asked for help. I attended a public town hall. And I was told I wasn't welcome. No threats. No violence. Just asking for accountability. And they excluded me."
📋 Evidence:
• Town hall date: February 19, 2026
• Location: Oakland City Hall (One Frank H. Ogawa Plaza)
• Exclusion reason claimed: "Alleged threats" (unsubstantiated)
• Actual basis: Whistleblower retaliation for fraud report (1/19/26)
• Days between report and exclusion: 31 days
• Witness: Chelsea Geer (present, audio recorded)
• Claim filed: Defamation, libel, slander, unlawful exclusion from public forum
📋 Document: Demand letter to Rep. Lateefah Simon (dated 2/19/2026)
📹 Audio Evidence: Town hall exclusion recording (witness: Chelsea Geer)
📍 Note: Surveillance footage preservation urgently needed (30-90 day auto-delete windows at City Hall)

📊 The Full Picture

16 Police Calls. 8 Months. One System Failure.

2025 documented incidents timeline:

  • 3 calls April 2025
  • 1 call June 2025
  • 2 calls August 2025
  • 4 calls September 2025 (crisis period)
  • 1 call October 2025
  • 4 calls November 2025
  • 1 call December 2025

The System Failures:

  • Veterans Affairs: Approved housing in an illegally red-tagged building
  • Insight Housing: Falsified financial disclosures to secure federal funds, then abandoned the veteran
  • Building Owner: Known felon (bribery) with documented history of maintaining unsafe properties
  • Law Enforcement: Responded to calls but never resolved the underlying safety crisis
  • Federal Agencies: No response to fraud reports or whistleblower complaints
  • Congressional Representative: Excluded the whistleblower from public forum instead of investigating fraud

What Jesse Had:

  • 16 documented police calls with audio/video evidence
  • Professional security audit confirming unsafe conditions
  • Recorded federal complaint to VA Homeless Veterans Hotline
  • Multiple video recordings of harassment and property damage
  • Documentary evidence of fraudulent financial disclosures
  • Property records showing building red-tagged in 2019
  • Criminal background check on property owner
  • Contemporaneous written complaints and demands

What Jesse Faced:

  • Eviction 4 days after federal whistleblower complaint
  • Default judgment entered without due process
  • Writ of Possession and threatened homelessness
  • Exclusion from public forum when seeking Congressional help
  • No institutional response to fraud documentation
  • Property seized by police (iPhone) without warrant (6/13/2026)
  • No charges filed despite arrest

🔗 Support & Resources